Using Dali for Structural Comparison of Proteins

Liisa Holm1, Sakari Kääriäinen1, Chris Wilton1, Dariusz Plewczynski2

1 Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 2 Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computation Modeling, University of Warsaw, Warsaw
Publication Name:  Current Protocols in Bioinformatics
Unit Number:  Unit 5.5
DOI:  10.1002/0471250953.bi0505s14
Online Posting Date:  July, 2006
GO TO THE FULL TEXT: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Abstract

The Dali program is widely used for carrying out automatic comparisons of protein structures determined by X‐ray crystallography or NMR. The most familiar version is the Dali server, which performs a database search comparing a query structure supplied by the user against the database of known structures (PDB) and returns the list of structural neighbors by e‐mail. The more recently introduced DaliLite server compares two structures against each other and visualizes the result interactively. The Dali database is a structural classification based on precomputed all‐against‐all structural similarities within the PDB. The resulting hierarchical classification can be browsed on the Web and is linked to protein sequence classification resources. All Dali resources use an identical algorithm for structure comparison. Users may run Dali using the Web, or the program may be downloaded to be run locally on Linux computers.

Keywords: classification of protein folds; database searching; distance geometry; pattern recognition; protein structure alignment

     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Table of Contents

  • Basic Protocol 1: Using the Interactive DaliLite Server for Pairwise Comparisons
  • Basic Protocol 2: Searching for Structural Neighbors Using the Dali E‐mail Server
  • Basic Protocol 3: Using the Dali Database to Investigate Familial Relations Among the Universe of Protein Folds
  • Alternate Protocol 1: Comparing Two Structures Using the Stand‐Alone Version of DaliLite
  • Alternate Protocol 2: Comparing Large Sets of Structures Using the Stand‐Alone Version of DaliLite
  • Support Protocol 1: Downloading and Installing the DaliLite Stand‐Alone Program
  • Guidelines for Understanding Results
  • Commentary
  • Appendix
  • Literature Cited
  • Figures
  • Tables
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Materials

GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Figures

Videos

Literature Cited

   Chothia, C. and Lesk, A.M. 1986. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5:823‐826.
   Dietmann, S. and Holm, L. 2001. Identification of homology in protein structure classification. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:953‐957.
   Falicov, A. and Cohen, F.E. 1996. A surface of minimum area metric for the structural comparison of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 258:871‐892.
   Heger, A. and Holm, L. 2003. Exhaustive enumeration of protein domain families. J. Mol. Biol. 328:749‐767.
   Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1993. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233:123‐138.
   Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1994. Parser for protein folding units. Proteins 19:256‐268.
   Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1995. 3‐D lookup: Fast protein structure database searches at 90% reliability, pp. 179‐187. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, Calif.
   Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1996. Mapping the protein universe. Science 273:595‐602.
   Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1997. An evolutionary treasure: Unification of a broad set of amidohydrolases related to urease. Proteins 28:72‐82.
   Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22:2577‐2637.
   Kolodny, R. and Linial, N. 2004. Approximate protein structural alignment in polynomial time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101:12201‐12206.
   Novotny, M., Madsen, D., and Kleywegt, G.J. 2004. Evaluation of protein fold comparison servers. Proteins 54:260‐270.
   Sierk, M.L. and Kleywegt, G.J. 2004. Deja vu all over again: Finding and analyzing protein structure similarities. Structure 12:2103‐2111.
Key References
   Holm and Sander. 1993. See above.
  The original Dali reference.
   Holm and Sander, 1996. See above.
  Reviews structure comparison methodology, key results, and implications.
   Holm, L. and Park, J. 2000. DaliLite workbench for protein structure comparison. Bioinformatics 16:566‐567.
  The main DaliLite reference, which should be cited in any publication using DaliLite results.
Internet Resources
   http://www.ebi.ac.uk/DaliLite
  The interactive DaliLite server for comparing two structures to each other and visualizing the structural superimposition.
   http://www.ebi.ac.uk/dali
  The Dali e‐mail server for comparing a new structure against the database of known structures.
   http://www.bioinfo.biocenter.helsinki.fi/dali
  The Dali database for browsing structural and sequence neighbors of proteins.
   http://www.bioinfo.biocenter.helsinki.fi/sqgraph/pairsdb
  The ADDA classification assigns every residue of known protein sequences into a domain family and interactively visualizes the sequence neighbors of any query protein in a multiple alignment.
   http://srs.ebi.ac.uk
  SRS at EBI and Entrez at NCBI are comprehensive search engines that cross‐reference the PDB identifier of a protein to many other databases.
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library