Detecting Protein–Protein Interactions with CFP‐YFP FRET by Acceptor Photobleaching

Tatiana Karpova1, James G. McNally1

1 National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Publication Name:  Current Protocols in Cytometry
Unit Number:  Unit 12.7
DOI:  10.1002/0471142956.cy1207s35
Online Posting Date:  February, 2006
GO TO THE FULL TEXT: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Abstract

FRET is a light microscopy method for detecting protein‐protein interactions within intact cells. The FRET protocol presented here is for CFP‐ and YFP‐tagged proteins examined with an argon laser on a scanning confocal microscope. FRET is assayed by one of the most straightforward approaches available, namely, acceptor photobleaching. In this procedure, the YFP‐tagged protein (the FRET “acceptor”) is photobleached at a cellular site of interest, and then the intensity of the CFP‐tagged protein (the FRET “donor”) at that same site is measured. In principle, FRET is detected when the CFP intensity increases after the photobleaching of YFP. This unit describes the appropriate steps to perform this measurement, as well as the necessary controls to ensure that an increase in CFP intensity, if detected, in fact reflects bona fide FRET. Successful application of the protocol will support the conclusion that the CFP‐ and YFP‐tagged proteins directly interact at the site of the photobleaching

Keywords: Förster resonance energy transfer; FRET; acceptor photobleaching; CFP; YFP; protein interactions; LSM510 Zeiss confocal microscope; confocal microscopy; argon laser

     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Table of Contents

  • Basic Protocol 1: Fret for Fixed Cells
  • Alternate Protocol 1: FRET for Live Cells
  • Commentary
  • Literature Cited
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Materials

Basic Protocol 1: Fret for Fixed Cells

  Materials
  • Plasmids (Ausubel et al., ) for Protein1‐YFP and Protein2‐CFP (to test for FRET between Protein1 and Protein2) and for CFP‐YFP fusion, unconjugated CFP, and unconjugated YFP (as controls)
  • Cell line of interest
  • 2% (v/v) formaldehyde in PBS
  • Phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS; appendix 2A)
  • Mounting medium without antifade
  • No. 1.5 coverslips
  • 6‐well tissue‐culture plate
  • Laser scanning confocal microscope: e.g., Zeiss LSM510 or similar system with:
    • Argon laser tuned to 458‐nm and 514‐nm laser lines
    • 470‐ to 500‐nm band‐pass emission filter (BP470‐500) for CFP
    • 530‐nm long‐pass emission filter (LP530) for YFP
    • Chroma q500Ip (505 nm) beam splitter
    • LSM510 physiology software (Zeiss) or comparable software enabling quantification of intensities
  • Additional reagents and equipment for transfection (Seidman et al., ) and culture ( appendix 3B) of mammalian cells

Alternate Protocol 1: FRET for Live Cells

  • Environmental chamber or a stage heater, such as a Nevtek ASI400
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Figures

Videos

Literature Cited

Literature Cited
   Agresti, A., Scaffidi, P., Riva, A., Caiolfa, V.R., and Bianchi, M.E. 2005. GR and HMGB1 interact only within chromatin and influence each other's residence time. Mol. Cell 18:109‐121.
   Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A., and Struhl, K. 2005. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J.
   Cornea, A. and Conn, P.M. 2002. Measurement of changes in fluorescence resonance energy transfer between gonadotropin‐releasing hormone receptors in response to agonists. Methods 27:333‐339.
   Damelin, M. and Silver, P.A. 2000. Mapping interactions between nuclear transport factors in living cells reveals pathways through the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Cell 5:133‐140.
   Day, R.N., Periasamy, A., and Schaufele, F. 2001. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy of localized protein interactions in the living cell nucleus. Methods 25:4‐18.
   Elangovan, M., Wallrabe, H., Chen, Y., Day, R.N., Barroso, M., and Periasamy, A. 2003. Characterization of one‐ and two‐photon excitation fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy. Methods 29:58‐73.
   Gadella, T.W. Jr. and Jovin, T.M. 1995. Oligomerization of epidermal growth factor receptors on A431 cells studied by time‐resolved fluorescence imaging microscopy. A stereochemical model for tyrosine kinase receptor activation. J. Cell Biol. 129:1543‐1558.
   Gordon, G.W., Berry, G., Liang, X.H., Levine, B., and Herman, B. 1998. Quantitative fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements using fluorescence microscopy. Biophys. J. 74:2702‐2713.
   Herman, B. 1989. Resonance energy transfer microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 30:219‐243.
   Jovin, T.M. and Arndt‐Jovin, D.J. 1989. Luminescence digital imaging microscopy. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 18: 271‐308.
   Karpova, T.S., Baumann, C.T., He, L., Wu, X., Grammer, A., Lipsky, P., Hager, G.L., and McNally, J.G. 2003. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer from cyan to yellow fluorescent protein detected by acceptor photobleaching using confocal microscopy and a single laser. J Microsc. 209:56‐70.
   Kenworthy, A.K., Petranova, N., and Edidin, M. 2000. High‐resolution FRET microscopy of cholera toxin B‐subunit and GPI‐anchored proteins in cell plasma membranes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11:1645‐1655.
   Kenworthy, A.K. 2001. Imaging protein‐protein interactions using fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy. Methods 24:289‐296.
   Llopis, J., Westin, S., Ricote, M., Wang, Z., Cho, C.Y., Kurokawa, R., Mullen, T.M., Rose, D.W., Rosenfeld, M.G., Tsien, R.Y., and Glass, C.K. 2000. Ligand‐dependent interactions of coactivators steroid receptor coactivator‐1 and peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor binding protein with nuclear hormone receptors can be imaged in live cells and are required for transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:4363‐4368.
   Nagai, T., Ibata, K., Park, E.S., Kubota, M., Mikoshiba, K., and Miyawaki, A. 2002. A variant of yellow fluorescent protein with fast and efficient maturation for cell‐biological applications. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:87‐90.
   Patterson, G.H., Piston, D.W., and Barisas, B.G. 2000. Förster distances between green fluorescent protein pairs. Anal. Biochem. 284:438‐440.
   Pertz, O. and Hahn, K.M. 2004. Designing biosensors for Rho family proteins: Deciphering the dynamics of Rho family GTPase activation in living cells. J. Cell Sci. 117:1313‐1318.
   Rizzo, M.A., Springer, G.H., Granada, B., and Piston, D.W. 2004. An improved cyan fluorescent protein variant useful for FRET. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:445‐449.
   Seidman, C.E., Struhl, K., Sheen, J., and Jessen, T. 1997. Introduction of plasmid DNA into cells. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (F.M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R.E. Kingston, D.D. Moore, J.G. Seidman, J.A. Smith, and K. Struhl, eds.) pp. 1.8.1‐1.8.10. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J.
   Shaner, N.C., Campbell, R.E., Steinbach, P.A., Giepmans, B.N., Palmer, A.E., and Tsien, R.Y. 2004. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:1567‐1572.
   Valentin, G., Verheggen, C., Piolot, T., Neel, H., Coppey‐Moisan, M., and Bertrand, E. 2005. Photoconversion of YFP into a CFP‐like species during acceptor photobleaching FRET experiments. Nat. Methods 2:801.
   Wallrabe, H. and Periasamy, A. 2005. Imaging protein molecules using FRET and FLIM microscopy. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16:19‐27.
   Xia, Z. and Liu, Y. 2001. Reliable and global measurement of fluorescence resonance energy transfer using fluorescence microscopes. Biophys. J. 81:2395‐2402.
   Yang, X., Xu, P., and Xu, T. 2005. A new pair for inter‐and intra‐molecular FRET measurement. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 330:914‐920.
   Youvan, D.C., Silva, C.M., Bylina, E.J., Coleman, W.J., Dilworth, M.R., and Yang, M.M. 1997. Calibration of fluorescence resonance energy transfer in microscopy using genetically engineered GFP derivatives on nickel chelating beads. Biotechnology 3:1‐18.
   Zaccolo, M. 2004. Use of chimeric fluorescent pro teins and fluorescence resonance energy transfer to monitor cellular responses. Circ. Res. 94:866‐873.
   Zacharias, D.A., Violin, J.D., Newton, A.C., and Tsien, R.Y. 2002. Partitioning of lipid‐modified monomeric GFPs into membrane microdomains of live cells. Science 296:855‐857.
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library