Detecting Gene‐Gene Interaction in Linkage Analysis

Chun Li1

1 Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
Publication Name:  Current Protocols in Human Genetics
Unit Number:  Unit 1.15
DOI:  10.1002/0471142905.hg0115s46
Online Posting Date:  August, 2005
GO TO THE FULL TEXT: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Abstract

Linkage analysis has been very successful in identifying genes for many Mendelian diseases, but has not enjoyed the same level of success for complex diseases. A major reason is that complex diseases are multifactorial, involving multiple genes and environmental factors. Linkage analysis is powerful for localizing disease genes with moderate marginal effects with most realistic sample sizes. Traditionally it has been used to search for a single disease locus at one time, and most implementations lack the power to detect genes with small marginal effect but moderate to strong interaction effect with other genes. Thus, methods for detecting gene‐gene interaction in linkage analysis are needed. A brief background on gene‐gene interaction in linkage analysis is given, with a review of two major approaches: two‐locus linkage analysis and interaction analysis. Three methods of interaction analysis are also reviewed: conditional linkage analysis, ordered subset analysis, and generalized estimating equations.

Keywords: gene‐gene interaction; two‐locus linkage analysis; conditional linkage analysis; ordered subset analysis; generalized estimating equations

     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Table of Contents

  • Two‐Locus Linkage Analysis
  • Interaction Analysis
  • Literature Cited
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Materials

GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Figures

Videos

Literature Cited

   Abecasis, G.R., Cherny, S.S., Cookson, W.O., and Cardon, L.R. 2002. Merlin‐rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat. Genet. 30:97‐101.
   Cordell, H.J., Todd, J.A., Bennett, S.T., Kawaguchi, Y., and Farrall, M. 1995. Two‐locus maximum lod score analysis of a multifactorial trait: Joint consideration of IDDM2 and IDDM4 with IDDM1 in type 1 diabetes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57:920‐934.
   Cordell, H.J., Wedig, G.C., Jacobs, K.B., and Elston, R.C. 2000. Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66:1273–1286.
   Cox, N.J., Frigge, M., Nicolae, D.L., Concannon, P., Hanis, C.L., Bell, G.I., and Kong, A. 1999. Loci on chromosomes 2 (NIDDM1) and 15 interact to increase susceptibility to diabetes in Mexican Americans. Nat. Genet. 21:213‐215.
   Dupuis, J., Brown, P.O., and Siegmund, D. 1995. Statistical methods for linkage analysis of complex traits from high resolution maps of identity by descent. Genetics 140:843‐856.
   Farrall, M. 1997. Affected sibpair linkage tests for multiple linked susceptibility genes. Genet. Epidemiol. 14:103‐115.
   Gudbjartsson, D.F., Jonasson, K., Frigge, M.L., and Kong, A. 2000. Allegro, a new computer program for multipoint linkage analysis. Nat. Genet. 25:12‐13.
   Hanis, C.L., Boerwinkle, E., Chakraborty, R., Ellsworth, D.L., Concannon, P., Stirling, B., Morrison, V.A., Wapelhorst, B., Spielman, R.S., Gogolin‐Ewens, K.J., Shepard, J.M., Williams, S.R., Risch, N., Hinds, D., Iwasaki, N., Ogata, M., Omori, Y., Petzold, C., Rietzch, H., Schroder, H.E., Schulze, J., Cox, N.J., Menzel, S., Boriraj, V.V., and Chen, X. 1996. A genome‐wide search for human non‐insulin‐dependent (type 2) diabetes genes reveals a major susceptibility locus on chromosome 2. Nat. Genet. 13:161‐166.
   Hauser, E.R., Watanabe, R.M., Duren, W.L., Bass, M.P., Langefeld, C.D., and Boehnke, M. 2004. Ordered subset analysis in genetic linkage mapping of complex traits. Genet. Epidemiol. 27:53‐63.
   Horikawa, Y., Oda, N., Cox, N.J., Li, X., Orho‐Melander, M., Hara, M., Hinokio, Y., Lindner, T.H., Mashima, H., Schwarz, P.E., del Bosque‐Plata, L., Horikawa, Y., Oda, Y., Yoshiuchi, I., Colilla, S., Polonsky, K.S., Wei, S., Concannon, P., Iwasaki, N., Schulze, J., Baier, L.J., Bogardus, C., Groop, L., Boerwinkle, E., Hanis, C.L., and Bell, G.I. 2000. Genetic variation in the gene encoding calpain‐10 is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Genet. 26:163‐175.
   Kong, A. and Cox, N.J. 1997. Allele‐sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61:1179‐1188.
   Kruglyak, L., Daly, M.J., Reeve‐Daly, M.P., Lander, E.S. 1996. Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: A unified multipoint approach. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58:1347‐1363.
   Lathrop, G.M., Ott, J. 1990. Analysis of complex diseases under oligogenic models and intrafamilial heterogeneity by the LINKAGE programs. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 47:A188 [abstract].
   Liang, K.Y., Chiu, Y.F., Beaty, T.H., and Wjst, M. 2001. Multipoint analysis using affected sib pairs: Incorporating linkage evidence from unlinked regions. Genet. Epidemiol. 21:105‐122.
   Liang, K.Y. and Zeger, S.L. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13‐22.
   MacLean, C.J., Sham, P.C., and Kendler, K.S. 1993. Joint linkage of multiple loci for a complex disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53:353‐366.
   Olson, J.M. 1999. A general conditional‐logistic model for affected‐relative‐pair linkage studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65:1760‐1769.
   Risch, N. 1990a. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. I. Multilocus models. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 46:222‐228.
   Risch, N. 1990b. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 46:229‐241.
   Risch, N. 1990c. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. III. The effect of marker polymorphism on analysis of affected relative pairs. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 46:242‐253.
   Schork, N.J., Boehnke, M., Terwilliger, J.D., and Ott, J. 1993. Two‐trait‐locus linkage analysis: A powerful strategy for mapping complex genetic traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53:1127‐1136.
   Wjst, M., Fischer, G., Immervoll, T., Jung, M., Saar, K., Rueschendorf, F., Reis, A., Ulbrecht, M., Gomolka, M., Weiss, E.H., Jaeger, L., Nickel, R., Richter, K., Kjellman, N.I., Griese, M., von Berg, A., Gappa, M., Riedel, F., Boehle, M., van Koningsbruggen, S., Schoberth, P., Szczepanski, R., Dorsch, W., Silbermann, M., and Wichmann, H.E. 1999. A genome‐wide search for linkage to asthma. Genomics 58:1‐8.
Internet Resources
   http://www.fhcrc.org/labs/kruglyak/Downloads/index.html
  Genehunter.
   http://galton.uchicago.edu/genehunterplus/
  Genehunter Plus
   allegro@decode.is
  E‐mail to inquire about the software program Allegro (there is presently no URL for this application).
   http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/abecasis/Merlin/
  Merlin.
   http://wwwchg.duhs.duke.edu/software/osa.html
  OSA.
   http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/∼wmchen/gf.html
  GeneFinder.
   http://linkage.rockefeller.edu/ott/tlinkage.htm
  Web site for LINKAGE.
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library