Overview of Human Identity Testing and Forensic Genetics

Frederick R. Bieber1

1 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Publication Name:  Current Protocols in Human Genetics
Unit Number:  Unit 14.1
DOI:  10.1002/0471142905.hg1401s15
Online Posting Date:  May, 2001
GO TO THE FULL TEXT: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Abstract

This unit discusses the development of the field of forensic genetics, touching on the quality control and legal issues that are central to this area. It closes with a discussion of some caveats for interpreting forensic DNA results.

     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Table of Contents

  • Background Information
  • Validation Studies and Population Studies
  • Laboratory and Personnel Accreditation
  • Laboratory Accreditation and Quality Assurance
  • Legal Aspects of Human Identity Testing and Forensic Genetics
  • Caveats in the Interpretation of Forensic DNA Testing
  • Literature Cited
  • Tables
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Materials

GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Figures

Videos

Literature Cited

Literature Cited
   Aldhous, P. 1993. Geneticists attack NRC report as scientifically flawed. Science 259:755‐756.
   Alford, R.L., Hammond, H.A., Coto, I., and Caskey, C.T. 1994. Rapid and efficient resolution of parentage by amplification of short tandem repeats. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 55:190‐195.
   Balazs, I., Baird, M., Clyne, M., and Meade, E. 1989. Human population genetic studies of five hypervariable DNA loci. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 44:182‐190.
   Billings, P.J. (ed.) 1992. DNA on Trial: Genetic Identification and Criminal Justice. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Budowle, B. 1995. The effects of inbreeding on DNA profile frequency estimates using PCR‐based loci. Genetica 96:21‐25.
   Budowle, B., Giusti, A.M., Waye, J.S., Baechtel, F.S., Fourney, R.M., Adams, D.E., Presley, L.A., Deadman, H.A., and Monson, K.L. 1991. Fixed‐bin analysis for statistical evaluation of continuous distributions of allelic data from VNTR loci, for use in forensic comparisons. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 48:841‐855.
   Budowle, B., Monson, K.L., and Wooley, J.R. 1992. Reliability of statistical estimates in forensic DNA typing. In DNA on Trial: Genetic Identification and Criminal Justice (P.J. Billings, ed.) pp. 112‐115. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Budowle, B., Baechtel, F.S., Smerick, J.B., Presley, K.W., Giusti, A.M., Parsons, G., Alexy, M.C., and Chakraborty, R. 1995a. D1S80 population data in African Americans, Caucasians, Southeastern Hispanics, Southwestern Hispanics, and Orientals. J. Forensic Sci. 40:38‐44.
   Budowle, B., Lindsay, J.A., DeCou, J.A., Koons, B.W., Giusti, A.M., and Comey, C.T. 1995b. Validation and population studies of the loci LDLR, GYPA, HBGG, D7S8, and GC (PM loci), and HLA‐DQ using a multiplex amplification and typing procedure. J. Forensic Sci. 40:45‐54.
   Coleman, H. and Swenson, E. 1994. DNA in the courtroom. Genelex Corp., Seattle, Wash.
   Comey, C.T. and Budowle, B. 1991. Validation studies on the analysis of the HLA DQα locus using the polymerase chain reaction. J. Forensic Sci. 36:1633‐1648.
   Cotton, R.W., Forman, L., and Word, C.J. 1991. Research on DNA typing validated in the literature. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 49:898‐899.
   Edwards, A., Hammond, H., Jin, L., Caskey, C.T., and Chakraborty, R. 1992. Genetic variation at five trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeat loci in four human population groups. Genomics 12:241‐253.
   Evett, I.W. and Gill, P. 1991. A discussion of the robustness of methods for assessing the evidential value of DNA single locus profiles in crime investigations. Electrophoresis 12:226‐230.
   Evett, I.W., Gill, P.D., Scranage, J.K., and Weir, B.S. 1996. Establishing the robustness of short‐tandem‐repeat statistics for the forensic applications. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58:398‐407.
   Galbraith, D.A., Boag, P.T., Gibbs, H.L., and White, B.N. 1991. Sizing bands on autoradiograms: A study of precision for scoring DNA fingerprints. Electrophoresis 12:210‐220.
   Galton, F. 1892. Fingerprints. MacMillan, London.
   Gill, P., Evett, I.W., Woodroffe, S., Lygo, J.E., Millican, E., and Webster, M. 1991. Databases, quality control and interpretation of DNA profiling in the Home Office Forensic Science Service. Electrophoresis 12:204‐209.
   Hammond, H.A., Zhong, Y., Caskey, C.T., and Chakraborty, R. 1994. Evaluation of 13 short tandem repeat loci for use in personal identification applications. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 55:175‐189.
   Helmuth, R., Fildes, N., Blake, E., Luce, M.C., Chimera, H., Madej, R., Gorodezky, C., Stoneking, M., Schmill, N., Klitz, W., Higuchi, R., and Erlich, H.A. 1990. HLA‐DQα allele and genotype frequencies in various human populations, determined by using enzymatic amplification and oligonucleotide probes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 47:515‐523.
   Herrin, G. 1993. Probability of matching RFLP patterns from unrelated individuals. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52:491‐497.
   Hochmeister, M.N., Budowle, B., Schumm, J.W., Sprecher, C.J., Borer, U.V., and Dirnhofer, R. 1995. Swiss population data and forensic efficiency values on 3 tetrameric short tandem repeat loci—HUMTH01, TPOX, and CSF1PO—derived using a STR multiplex system. Int. J. Leg. Med. 107:246‐249.
   Huang, N.E., Schumm, J., and Budowle, B. 1995. Chinese population data on three tetrameric short tandem repeat loci—HUMTH01, TPOX, and CSF1PO—derived using multiplex PCR and manual typing. Forensic Sci. Int. 71:131‐136.
   Kimpton, C., Fisher, D., Watson, S., Adams, M., Urquhart, A., Lygo, J., and Gill, P. 1994. Evaluation of an automated DNA profiling system employing multiplex amplification of four tetrameric STR loci. Int. J. Leg. Med. 106:302‐311.
   Krane, D.E., Allen, R.W., Sawyer, S.A., Petrov, D.A., and Hartl, D.L. 1992. Genetic differences at four DNA typing loci in Finnish, Italian, and mixed Caucasian populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89:10583‐10587.
   Lander, E.S. 1989. DNA fingerprinting on trial. Nature 339:501‐505.
   Lander, E.S. and Budowle, B. 1994. DNA fingerprinting dispute laid to rest. Nature. 371:735‐738.
   Lee, H.C., Gaensslen, R.E., Bigbee, P.D., and Kearney, J.J. 1993. Guidelines for the collection and preservation of DNA evidence. United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
   Lewontin, R.C. 1993. Which population? (letter). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52:205.
   Lygo, J.E., Johnson, P.E., Holdaway, D.K., Woodroffe, S., Whitaker, J.P., Clayton, T.M., Kimpton, C.P., and Gill, P. 1996. The validation of short tandem repeat (STR) loci for use in forensic casework. Int. J. Leg. Med. 107:77‐89.
   McEwen, J.E. 1995. Forensic DNA data banking by state crime laboratories. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 56:1487‐1492.
   McEwen, J.E. and Reilly, P.R. 1994. A review of state legislation on DNA forensic data banking. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 54:941‐958.
   Micka, K.A., Sprecher, C.J., Lins, A.M., Comey, C.T., Koons, B.W., Crose, C., Endean, D., Pirelli, K., Lee, S.B., Duda, N., Ma, M., and Schumm, J.W. 1996. Validation of multiplex polymorphic STR amplification sets developed for personal identification applications. J. Forensic Sci. 41:582‐590.
   Miles, H.L., Bieber, F.R., Bing, D.H., Bourke, M.T., Hinkle, M.C., McPhee, W.C., Stearns, R.G., and Vuono, A.D. 1995. DNA and other scientific evidence. How to use it and how to challenge it in the courtroom. Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education No. 95‐06.15, Boston, Mass.
   National Institute of Justice. 1996. Convicted by juries: Exhonerated by DNA. NIJ, Washington, D.C.
   National Research Council. 1992. DNA technology in forensic science. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
   National Research Council 1996. The evaluation of forensic DNA evidence. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
   Neeser, D. and Liechti‐Gallati, S. 1995. Sex determination of forensic samples by simultaneous PCR amplification of alpha‐satellite DNA from both the X and Y chromosomes. J. Forensic Sci. 40:239‐241.
   Richards, B., Skoletsky, J., Shuber, A.P., Balfour, R., Stern, R.C., Dorkin, H.L., Parad, R.B., and Klinger, K.W. 1993. Multiplex PCR amplification from the CFTR gene using DNA prepared from buccal brushes/swabs. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2:159‐163.
   Saferstein, R. 1995. Criminalistics, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
   Sajantila, A., Budowle, B., Strom, M., Johnsson, V., Lukka, M., Peltonen, L., and Ehnholm, C. 1992. PCR amplification of alleles at the D1S80 locus: Comparison of a Finnish and a North American Caucasian population sample, and forensic casework evaluation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 50:816‐825.
   Scheck, B. 1994. DNA data banking: A cautionary tale (invited editorial). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 54:931‐933.
   Shuber, A.P., Skoletsky, J., Stern, R., and Handelin, B.L. 1993. Efficient 12‐mutation testing in the CFTR gene: A general model for complex mutation analysis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2:153‐158.
   Steinberger, E.M., Thompson, L.D., and Hartmann, J.M. 1993. On the use of excess homozygosity for subpopulation detection (letter). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52:1275‐1277.
   Technical Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (TWGDAM) 1995. Guidelines for a quality assurance program for DNA analysis. Crime Lab. Digest 22:21‐50.
   Thompson, W.A. 1993. Evaluating the admissibility of new genetic identification tests: Lessons from the DNA war. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 84:22‐45.
   U.S. Department of Justice 1996. State DNA database laws: Outline of provisions. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C.
   Wambaugh, J. 1989. The Blooding. William Morrow and Company, New York.
   Weir, B.S. 1996. Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
   Weir, B.S. and Buckleton, J.S. 1995. Tests for disequilibrium in Cellmark databases: Polymarker and STR data. Cellmark Diagnostics, Germantown, Md.
   Weir, B.S. and Evett, I.W. 1993. Reply to Lewontin (letter). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52:206.
   Wooley, J. and Harmon, R.P. 1992. The forensic DNA brouhaha: Science or debate? (letter). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51:1164‐1165.
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library