Skin Allograft Rejection

Hugh I. McFarland1, Amy S. Rosenberg1

1 Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Maryland
Publication Name:  Current Protocols in Immunology
Unit Number:  Unit 4.4
DOI:  10.1002/0471142735.im0404s84
Online Posting Date:  February, 2009
GO TO THE FULL TEXT: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Abstract

Skin allograft rejection is a test of the competence of T lymphocytes to mediate in vivo tissue destruction, which in turn reflects their role in critical functions such as anti‐viral and tumor immunity. The tail‐skin graft procedure described in this unit is useful predominantly because of the ease of preparation and resistance to ischemic (nonspecific) necrosis. Additionally, it is not necessary to sacrifice the donor mouse. However, rejection of tail‐skin grafts should not be used to test for genetic homogeneity in breeding experiments or to detect minor histocompatibility (minor‐H) antigens because tail skin is less sensitive than trunk skin in detecting such differences. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 84:4.4.1‐4.4.13. © 2009 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Keywords: transplantation; skin; allograft; rejection; T lymphocyte; histocompatibility; MHC; grafting; mouse

     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Table of Contents

  • Reagents and Solutions
  • Commentary
  • Literature Cited
  • Figures
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Materials

Basic Protocol 1:

  Materials
  • Allogeneic donor and recipient (host) mice, <1 year old and preferably female (see )
  • Isoflurane or ketamine/xylazine anesthesia (see recipe)
  • Oxygen source
  • 70% ethanol
  • Phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS; appendix 2A), sterile
  • 10% povidone/iodine
  • Isoflurane vaporizer (Ohio or Cyprane style, VetEquip)
  • Nose cone
  • Thermal barrier (Vetko)
  • Dry (bead) sterilizer
  • Balance for weighing animals (Ohaus triple beam balance, 700 series, with animal basket)
  • Sterile gauze pads
  • Microdissecting forceps (4‐in., half‐curved, serrated; 5‐in., straight, serrated or nonserrated)
  • Watchmaker's or jeweler's forceps (4½‐in., 0.17‐mm wide, 0.10‐mm thick; Dumont no. 7)
  • 100 × 20–mm plastic petri dishes
  • 9.0‐cm Whatman no. 1 filter paper discs
  • Scalpel blades (Bard Parker no. 10)
  • Electric animal clippers
  • Microdissecting scissors (4½ in., curved, with very sharp points; 4 in., straight)
  • Operating board
  • 3 × 18–in. Vaseline petrolatum gauze
  • 3/4‐in. sheer Band‐Aid‐type sheer bandage (CVS, Curad)
  • Good light source, preferably one that can be focused (e.g., a multipiped fiberoptic light)
  • Autoclip (automatic wound clip–applying forceps), with wound clips and autoclip remover
  • Additional reagents and equipment for anesthesia (unit 1.4), intraperitoneal injection of mice (unit 1.6), and animal euthanasia (unit 1.8)
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Figures

Videos

Literature Cited

   Benichou, G., Kant, C.D., Madsen, J., and Tocco, G. 2007. Modulation of alloreactivity to MHC‐derived peptides and transplantation tolerance. Front. Biosci. 12:4239‐4247.
   Bergstresser, P.R., Fletcher, C.R., and Streilein, J.W. 1980a. Surface densities of Langerhans cells in relation to rodent epidermal sites with special immunologic properties. J. Invest. Dermatol. 74:77‐80.
   Bergstresser, P.R., Toews, G.B., Gilliam, J.N., and Streilein, J.W. 1980b. Unusual numbers and distributions of Langerhans cells in skin with unique immunologic properties. J. Invest. Dermatol. 74:312‐314.
   Billingham, R.E. 1954. The storage of skin. In Preservation and Transplantation of Normal Tissues (G.E.W. Wolstenholme and M.P. Cameron, eds.) pp. 160‐171. Churchill, London.
   Billingham, R.E. 1961. Free skin grafting in mammals. In Transplantation of Tissues and Cells (R.E. Billingham and W.K. Silvers, eds.) pp. 1‐29. Wistar Institute Press, Philadelphia.
   Billingham, R.E. and Brent, L. 1956. Further attempts to transfer transplantation immunity by means of serum. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 37:566‐569.
   Billingham, R.E. and Medawar, P.B. 1951. The technique of free skin grafting in mammals. J. Exp. Biol. 28:385‐402.
   Billingham, R.E., Brent, L., and Medawar, P.B. 1954. Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. II. The origin, strength, and duration of actively and adoptively acquired immunity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 143:58‐80.
   Cerny, A., Ramseier, H., Bazin, H., and Zinkernagel, R.M. 1988. Unimpaired 1st set and 2nd set skin graft rejection in agammaglobulinemic mice. Transplantation 45:1111‐1113.
   Chen, H.‐D. and Silvers, W.K. 1983. Influence of Langerhans cells on the survival of H‐Y incompatible skin grafts in rats. J. Invest. Dermatol. 81:20‐23.
   Cobbold, S.P., Adams, E., Graca, L., Daley, S., Yates, S., Paterson, A., Robertson, N.J., Nolan, K.F., Fairchild, P.J., and Waldmann, H. 2006. Immune privilege induced by regulatory T cells in transplantation tolerance. Immunol. Rev. 213:239‐255.
   Converse, J.M. and Rapaport, F.T. 1956. The vascularization of skin autografts and homografts: An experimental study in man. Ann. Surg. 143:306‐310.
   Counce, S., Smith, P., Barth, R., and Snell, G.D. 1956. Strong and weak histocompatibility gene differences in mice and their role in the rejection of homografts of tumors and skin. Ann. Surg. 144:198‐204.
   Goldstein, D.R. 2006. Toll like receptors and acute allograft rejection. Transplant. Immunol. 17:11‐15.
   Gould, D.S. and Auchincloss, H. 1999. Direct and Indirect recognition: The role of MHC antigens in graft rejection. Immunol. Today 20:77‐82.
   Graff, R.J., Hildemann, W.H., and Snell, G.D. 1966a. Histocompatibility genes of mice. VI. Allografts of mice congenic at various non‐H‐2 histocompatibility loci. Transplantation 4:425‐437.
   Graff, R.J., Silvers, W.K., Billingham, R.E., Hildemann, W.H., and Snell, G.D. 1966b. The cumulative effect of histocompatibility antigens. Transplantation 4:605‐617.
   Hainz, U., Jürgens, B., and Heitger, A. 2007. The role of indolamine 2,3‐diolygenase in transplantation. Transplant. Int. 20:118‐127.
   Hildemann, W.H. and Cohen, N. 1967. Weak histoincompatibilities: Emerging immunogenetic rules and generalizations. In Histocompatibility Testing (E.S. Curtoni, P.L. Mattiuz, and R.M. Tosi, eds.) pp. 13‐20. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
   Hildemann, W.H. and Walford, R.L. 1960. Chronic skin homograft rejection in the Syrian hamster. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 87:56.
   Kubai, L. and Auerbach, R. 1980. Regional differences in the growth of skin transplants. Transplantation 30:128.
   Long, E. and Wood, K.J. 2007. Understanding Foxp3: Progress towards achieving transplantation tolerance. Transplantation 84:459‐461.
   Mathieson, B.J., Flaherty, L., Bennett, D., and Boyse, E.A. 1975. Differences in the rejection of trunk, skin, and tail‐skin allografts involving weak histocompatibility loci. Transplantation 19:525‐526.
   Medawar, P.B. 1944. The behavior and fate of skin autografts and skin homografts in rabbits. J. Anat. 78:176‐196.
   Ramselaar, C.G. and Ruytenberg, E.J. 1981. The influence of the hair follicle cycle on skin allografts in the congenitally athymic “nude” mouse. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 62:252‐258.
   Rosenberg, A.S. and Singer, A. 1992. Cellular basis of skin allograft rejection: An in vivo model of immune‐mediated tissue destruction. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 10:333‐358.
   Rosenberg, A.S., Mizuochi, T., and Singer, A. 1986. Analysis of T cell subsets in rejection of Kb mutant skin allografts differing at class I MHC. Nature 322:829.
   Sena, J., Wachtel, S.S., and Murphy, G. 1976. A comparison of the survival of H‐Y incompatible ear, tail, and body skin grafts. Transplantation 21:412‐416.
   Silvers, W.K., Murphy, G., and Poole, T.W. 1977. Studies on the H‐Y antigen in rats. Immunogenetics 4:85‐100.
   Steinmuller, D. 1984. Skin grafting. In Methods in Enzymology (G. Di Sabato, J.J. Langone, and H. Van Vunakis, eds.) p. 20. Academic Press, San Diego.
   Sykes, M., Auchincloss, H. Jr., and Sachs, D.H. 2003. Transplantation immunology. In Fundamental Immunology, 5th ed. (W.E. Paul, ed.) pp. 1481‐1555. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia.
   Wachtel, S.S. and Silvers, W.K. 1971. Skin homografts: Tolerogenic versus immunogenic influences in mice. J. Exp. Med. 133:921‐937.
   Winn, H.J. 1986. Antibody‐mediated rejection. In Kidney Transplantation Rejection (G.M. Williams, J.F. Burdick, and K. Solez, eds.) pp. 17‐28. Marcel Dekker, New York.
   Wood, K.J. and Sakaguchi, S. 2003. Regulatory T cells in transplantation tolerance. Nat. Rev. 3:199‐210.
Key References
   Sykes et al., 2003. See above.
  Comprehensive and easy‐to‐read overview of graft rejection on both the clinical and basic research levels.
   Steinmuller, 1984. See above.
  A good “how to” including elegant refinements of some techniques.
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library