MRI of the Female Pelvis

Kathy Wilber1, Richard Semelka1, Laurie Fisher2

1 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 2 Siemens Uptime Service Center, Cary, North Carolina
Publication Name:  Current Protocols in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Unit Number:  Unit A20.1
DOI:  10.1002/0471142719.mia2001s00
Online Posting Date:  May, 2001
GO TO THE FULL TEXT: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library


MRI provides an effective means for evaluating the female pelvis. This unit present a basic protocol for imaging the female pelvis. The protocol is designed to evaluate for the presence of fibroids or adenomyosis, uterine anomalies, and endometriosis. This protocol also provides limited evaluation of adnexal disease processes including: identification of ovaries, hemorrhagic ovarian cysts, and dermoid tumors.

PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Table of Contents

  • Basic Protocol 1: Imaging the Female Pelvis
  • Commentary
  • Figures
  • Tables
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library


PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library



Literature Cited

Literature Cited
   Ascher, S.M., Agrawal, R., Bis, K.G., Brown, E.D., Maximovich, A., Markham, S.M., Patt, R.H., and Semelka, R.C. 1995. Endometriosis: Appearance and detection with conventional and contrast‐enhanced fat‐suppressed spin‐echo techniques. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 5:251‐257.
   Ascher, S.M., Arnold, L.L., Patt, R.H., Schruefer, J.J., Bagley, A.S., Semelka, R.C., Zeman, R.K., and Simon, J.A. 1994. Adenomyosis: Prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology 190:803‐806.
   Carrington, B.M., Hricak, H., Nuruddin, R.N., Secaf, E., Laros, R.K., and Hill, E.C. 1990. Mullerian duct anomalies. MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 176:715‐720.
   Ha, H.K., Lim, Y.T., Kim, H.S., Suh, T.S., Song, H.H., and Kim, S.J. 1994. Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: Fat‐suppressed T1‐weighted vs. conventional MR images. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 163:127‐131.
   Hricak, H. 1986. MRI of the female pelvis: A review. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 146(6):1115‐1122.
   Hricak, H., Tscholakoff, D., Heinrichs, L., Fisher, M.R., Dooms, G.C., Reinhold, C., and Jaffe, R.B. 1986. Uterine leiomyomas: Correlation of MR histopathologic findings, and symptoms. Radiology 158:385‐391.
   Kier, R., Smith, R.C., and McCarthy, S.M. 1992. Value of lipid‐ and water‐suppression MR images in distinguishing between blood and lipid with ovarian masses. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 158:321‐325.
   Mark, A.S., Hricak, H., Heinrichs, L.W., Hendrickson, M.R., Winkler, M.L., Bachica, J.A., and Stickler, J.E. 1987. Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: Differential diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 163:527‐529.
   Outwater, E.K. and Mitchell, D.G. 1996. Normal ovaries and functional cysts: MR appearance. Radiology 198:397‐402.
   Pellerito, J.S., McCarthy, S.M., Doyle, M.B., Glickman, M.G., and DeCherney, A.H. 1992. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: Relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 183:795‐800.
   Reinhold, C., Hricak, H., Forstner, R., Ascher, S.M., Bret, P.M., Meyer, W.R., and Semelka, R.C. 1997. Primary amenorrhea: Evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 203:383‐390.
   Scoutt, L.M., Flynn, S.D., Luthringer, D.J., McCauley, T.R., and McCarthy, S.M. 1991. Junctional zone of the uterus: Correlation of MR imaging and histologic examination of hysterectomy specimens. Radiology 179:403‐407.
   Shellock, F.G. and Kanal, E. 1996. Magnetic Resonance Bioeffects, Safety, and Patient Management. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia.
   Siegelman, E.S., Outwater, E.K., Wang, T., and Mitchell, D.G. 1994. Solid pelvic masses caused by endometriosis: MR imaging features. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 163:357‐361.
   Smith, R.C., Reinhold, C., McCauley, T.R., Lange, R.C., Constable, R.T., Kier, R., McCarthy, S. 1992. Multicoil high‐resolution fast spin‐echo MR imaging of the female pelvis. Radiolog y 184:671‐675.
   Stevens, S.K., Hricak, H., and Campos, Z. 1993. Teratomas versus cystic hemorrhagic adnexal lesions: Differentiation with proton‐selective fat‐saturation MR imaging. Radiology 186:481‐488.
   Sugimura, K., Okizuka, H., Imaoka, I., Kaji, Y., Takahashi, K., Kitao, M., and Ishida, T. 1993. Pelvic endometriosis: Detection and diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology 188:435‐438.
   Togashi, K., Nishimura, K., Kimura, I., Tsuda, Y., Yamashita, K., Shibata, T., Nakano, Y., Konishi, J., Konishi, I., and Mori, T. 1991. Endometrial cyst: Diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 180:73‐78.
   Togashi, K., Ozasa, H., Konishi, I., Itoh, H., Nishimura, K., Fujisawa, I., Noma, S., Sagoh, T., Minami, S., Yamashita, K., et al. 1989. Enlarged uterus: Differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 171:531‐534.
   Weinreb, J.C., Barkoff, N.D., Megibow, A., and Demopoulos, R. 1990. The value of MR imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic masses when sonography is indeterminate. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 154:295‐299.
   Zawin, M., McCarthy, S., Scoutt, L.M., and Comite, F. 1990. High‐field MRI and US evaluation of the pelvis in women with leiomyomas. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 8:371‐376.
Key References
   Shellock and Kanal, 1996. See above.
  Covers a number of important patient management issues related to MR imaging, including recommended safety procedures, a list of metallic implants that have been tested for MR compatibility, and a list of other sources on MR safety.
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library