Overview of Membrane Protein Solubilization

Michael I. Schimerlik1

1 Oregon state University, Corvallis, Oregon
Publication Name:  Current Protocols in Neuroscience
Unit Number:  Unit 5.9
DOI:  10.1002/0471142301.ns0509s02
Online Posting Date:  May, 2001
GO TO THE FULL TEXT: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library


The solubilization of membrane proteins (i.e., extraction of the protein from the membrane in a disperse state in aqueous solution) in a stable state that retains the native activity of the membrane‐bound form is more an empirical art than a protocol‐driven science. Although a large number of molecules have been invented that display detergent properties, selection of the proper solubilizing agent is largely a matter of trial and error that depends on the protein of interest and the particular goals of the investigator. The purpose of this overview is to describe the methodology for finding the optimal conditions for detergent solubilization and to relate the selection of a specific detergent to explicit experimental goals.

PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Table of Contents

  • Selection of Detergent
  • Evaluation of Solubilization Conditions
  • Solubilization of m2 Muscarinic Receptors
  • Conclusions
  • Literature Cited
  • Tables
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library


PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library



Literature Cited

Literature Cited
   Ashani, Y. and Catravas, G.N. 1980. Highly reactive impurities in Triton X‐100 and Brij 35: Partial characterization and removal. Anal. Biochem. 109:55‐62.
   Bradford, M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein‐dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248‐254.
   Castle, D.J. 1995. Purification of organelles from mammalian cells. In Current Protocols in Protein Science (J.E. Coligan, B.M. Dunn, H.L. Ploegh, D.W. Speicher, and P.T. Wingfield, eds.) pp. 4.2.1‐4.2.56. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Clarke, S. 1975. The size and detergent binding of membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 250:5459‐5469.
   Cremo, C.R., Herron, G.S., and Schimerlik, M.I. 1981. Solubilization of the atrial muscarinic receptor: A new detergent system and rapid assays. Anal. Biochem. 115:331‐338.
   Garavito, M.R., Picot, D., and Loll, P.J. 1996. Strategies for crystallizing membrane proteins. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 28:13‐27.
   Hjelmeland, L.M. 1990. Solubilization of native membrane proteins. Methods Enzymol. 182:253‐264.
   Hjelmeland, L.M. and Chrambach, A. 1984. Solubilization of functional membrane‐bound receptors. In Membranes, Detergents, and Receptor Solubilization (J.C. Venter and L.C. Harrison, eds.) pp. 35‐46. Alan R. Liss, New York.
   Hulme, E.C. and Birdsall, N.J.M. 1992. Strategy and tactics in receptor‐binding. In Studies in Receptor‐Ligand Interactions. A Practical Approach. (E.C. Hulme, ed.) pp. 153‐156. IRL Press, Oxford.
   Minamide, L.S. and Bamburg, J.R. 1990. A filter paper dye‐binding assay for quantitative determination of protein without interference from reducing agents or detergents. Anal. Biochem. 190:66‐70.
   Neugebauer, J. 1992. A Guide to the Properties and Uses of Detergents in Biology and Biochemistry. Corp. Doc. No. CB0068‐0892. Calbiochem‐Novabiochem, La Jolla, Calif.
   O'Brien, R.D., Timpone, C.A., and Gibson, R.E. 1978. The measurement of partial specific volumes and sedimentation coefficients by sucrose density centrifugation. Anal. Biochem. 86:602‐615.
   Peterson, G.L. 1983. Determination of total protein. Methods Enzymol. 91:95‐119.
   Peterson, G.L. and Schimerlik, M.I. 1984. Large scale preparation and characterization of membrane‐bound and detergent‐solubilized muscarinic acetylcholine receptor from pig atria. Prep. Biochem. 14:33‐74.
   Peterson, G.L., Rosenbaum, L.C., Broderick, D.J., and Schimerlik, M.I. 1986. Physical properties of the purified cardiac muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Biochemistry 25:3189‐3202.
   Peterson, G.L., Rosenbaum, L.C., and Schimerlik, M.I. 1988. Solubilization and hydrodynamic properties of pig atrial muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in dodecyl β‐D‐maltoside. Biochem. J. 255:553‐560.
   Peterson, G.L., Toumadje, A., Johnson, W.C., Jr., and Schimerlik, M.I. 1995. Purification of recombinant porcine m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor from Chinese hamster ovary cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270:17808‐17814.
   Rosenthal, K.S. and Kousale, F. 1983. Critical micelle determination of nonionic detergents with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G‐250. Anal. Chem. 55:1115‐1117.
   Ross, E.M. and Schatz, G. 1978. Purification and subunit composition of cytochrome c1 from baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 53:222‐229.
   Smith, P.K., Krohn, R.I., Hermanson, G.T., Mallia, A.K., Gartner, F.H., Provenzano, M.D., Fujimoto, E.K., Goeke, N.M., Olson, B.J., and Klenk, D.C. 1985. Measurement of protein using bicinchonic acid. Anal. Biochem. 150:76‐85.
   Steck, T.L. and Yu, J. 1973. Selective solubilization of proteins from red blood cell membranes by protein perturbants. J. Supramol. Struct. 1:220‐232.
   Vulliez‐Le Normand, B. and Eiselé, J.L. 1993. Determination of detergent critical micellar concentration by solubilization of a colored dye. Anal. Biochem. 208:241‐243.
   Wessel, D. and Flügge, U.I. 1984. A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Anal. Biochem. 138:141‐143.
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library