Role of Integrative Signaling Through Gap Junctions in Toxicology

Brad L. Upham1

1 Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
Publication Name:  Current Protocols in Toxicology
Unit Number:  Unit 2.18
DOI:  10.1002/0471140856.tx0218s47
Online Posting Date:  February, 2011
GO TO THE FULL TEXT: PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Abstract

Gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) plays a central role in coordinating signal‐transduction pathways that control gene expression inside of cells with those of neighboring cells in maintaining the homeostasis of a tissue. The normal homeostatic set point of gap junctions within tissues is in an open state, and although transient closure of gap junctions in response to mitogenic effectors is normal, chronic closure of channels by continuous exposure to environmental and food‐borne contaminants can result in adverse health effects such as cancer, teratogenesis, reproductive dysfunction, neuropathies, and cardiac arrhythmias. GJIC is the primary means of integrating signal transduction pathways controlling gene expression between contiguous cells. Thus, bioassay systems that can measure GJIC offer a central, more biosystems approach to assessing the potential for toxicants to epigenetically alter gene expression.Curr. Protoc. Toxicol. 47:2.18.1‐2.18.18. © 2011 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Keywords: gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC); scrape load‐dye transfer (SL‐DT); incision load‐dye transfer (IL‐DT); fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP); phosphatidyl choline specific phospholipase C (PC‐PLC); mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK); extracellular receptor kinase (ERK); MAPK/ERK kinase1/2 (MEK1/2); reactive oxygen species (ROS)

     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Table of Contents

  • Measurement of Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication
  • Strategic Planning
  • Basic Protocol 1: The Scrape‐Load Dye Transfer Technique
  • Basic Protocol 2: Quantitation of GJIC
  • Support Protocol 1: Determining Dose‐Response Conditions
  • Support Protocol 2: Determining Time‐Response and Time‐Recovery Conditions
  • Support Protocol 3: Determining GJIC Regulatory Mechanisms
  • Basic Protocol 3: In Vivo Analyses of Tumor‐Promoting and Chemopreventive Compounds
  • Reagents and Solutions
  • Commentary
  • Literature Cited
  • Figures
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Materials

Basic Protocol 1: The Scrape‐Load Dye Transfer Technique

  Materials
  • Monolayer of cells (F344‐WB from Drs. J.W. Grisham and M.S. Tsao, University of North Carolina‐Chapel Hill) cultured in D‐medium (formula no. 78‐5470EF, Invitrogen) supplemented with 5% FBS (Invitrogen), on 35‐mm tissue culture plates (Corning), and incubated at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO 2 incubator
  • Phosphate buffered saline (PBS; see recipe)or if cells tend to lift, use PBS with calcium and magnesium (see recipe).
  • 1.0 mg/ml Lucifer Yellow (LY) solution (see recipe)
  • 1.0 mg/ml LY/1.0 mg/ml rhodamine–dextran (RD) solution (see recipe; optional)
  • 10% (v/v) formalin (∼4% v/v formaldehyde; see recipe)
  • 35‐mm, 48‐well, or 96‐well cell culture plates
  • Surgical steel blade: no. 20 surgical blade and no. 4 handle; BD Bard‐Parker, http://www.bd.com/surgical/products/)
  • Epifluorescent phase contrast microscope or confocal microscope
  • 35‐mm camera or CCD camera

Basic Protocol 2: Quantitation of GJIC

  • Compounds to be tested for inhibition of GJIC

Support Protocol 1: Determining Dose‐Response Conditions

  • Stock solutions of U0126 (20 mM; see recipe), or the PC‐PLC inhibitor, D609 (20 mM; see recipe)
  • GJIC‐dysregulating chemical, e.g.: 1‐methylanthracene, 1‐methylfluorene, benzoylperoxide, 18‐β‐glycyrrhetinic acid, dicumylperoxide, fluoranthene, fluorene, pentachlorophenol, perfluorodecanoic acid, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, phenanthrene, pyrene, 12‐O‐tetradecanoylphorbol‐13‐acetate (Sigma‐Aldrich), 1,9‐dimethylanthracene, 1‐methylpyrene, perfluorooctanoic acid, 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′‐hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB153) (Fluka), alachlor, lindane (Chem Service, http://web1.chemservice.com/), 1,1,1‐trichloro‐2,2‐di(4‐chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT; Supelco)

Support Protocol 2: Determining Time‐Response and Time‐Recovery Conditions

  Materials
  • Liver of F344 rat treated with tumor‐promoting (see protocol 5) or chemopreventive compound (e.g., GJIC up‐regulators: resveratrol, β‐carotene, epigallocatechin gallate, retinoic acid, β‐sitosterol; Sigma‐Aldrich) (procedure can be adapted for other mammals)
  • 1.0 mg/ml Lucifer Yellow (LY; see recipe)
  • 10% (v/v) formalin (∼4% v/v formaldehyde; see recipe)
  • Plastic weigh plate
  • Gauze
  • Epifluorescent phase‐contrast microscope
  • Additional reagents and equipment for paraffin embedding (Zeller, ) and data analysis ( protocol 1)
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Figures

Videos

Literature Cited

Literature Cited
   Bergoffen, J., Scherer, S.S., Wang, S., Scott, M.O., Bone, L.J., Paul, D.L., Chen, K., Lensch, M.W., Chance, P.F., and Fischbeck, K.H. 1993. Connexin mutations in X‐linked Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease. Science 262:2039‐2042.
   Cole, W.C. and Garfield, R.E. 1986. Evidence for physiological regulation of myometrial gap junction permeability. Am. J. Physiol. 251:C411‐C420.
   Dakin, K. and Li, W.H. 2006. Infrared‐LAMP: Two‐photon uncaging and imaging of gap junctional communication in three dimensions. Nat. Methods 3:959.
   Dakin, K., Zhao, Y., and Li, W.H. 2005. LAMP, a new imaging assay of gap junctional communication unveils that Ca2+ influx inhibits cell coupling. Nat. Methods 2:55‐62.
   De Mello, W.C. 1982. Cell‐to‐cell communication in heart and other tissues. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 39:147‐182.
   El‐Fouly, M.H., Trosko, J.E., and Chang, C.C. 1987. Scrape‐loading and dye transfer. A rapid and simple technique to study gap junctional intercellular communication. Exp. Cell Res. 168:422‐430.
   Evans, W.H. and Martin, P.E. 2002. Gap junctions: Structure and function (Review). Mol. Membr. Biol. 19:121‐136.
   Evert, M., Ott, T., Temme, A., Willecke, K., and Dombrowski, F. 2002. Morphology and morphometric investigation of hepatocellular preneoplastic lesions and neoplasms in connexin32‐deficient mice. Carcinogenesis 23:697‐703.
   Gilula, N.B., Fawcett, D.W., and Aoki, A. 1976. The Sertoli cell occluding junctions and gap junctions in mature and developing mammalian testis. Dev.Biol. 50:142‐168.
   Goldberg, G.S., Bechberger, J.F., and Naus, C.C. 1995. A pre‐loading method of evaluating gap junctional communication by fluorescent dye transfer. Biotechniques 18:490‐497.
   King, T.J. and Lampe, P.D. 2004a. Mice deficient for the gap junction protein Connexin32 exhibit increased radiation‐induced tumorigenesis associated with elevated mitogen‐activated protein kinase (p44/Erk1, p42/Erk2) activation. Carcinogenesis 25:669‐680.
   King, T.J. and Lampe, P.D. 2004b. The gap junction protein connexin32 is a mouse lung tumor suppressor. Cancer Res. 64:7191‐7196.
   King, R.E., Kent, K.D., and Bomser, J.A. 2005a. Resveratrol reduces oxidation and proliferation of human retinal pigment epithelial cells via extracellular signal‐regulated kinase inhibition. Chem. Biol. Interact. 151:143‐149.
   King, T.J., Gurley, K.E., Prunty, J., Shin, J.L., Kemp, C.J., and Lampe, P.D. 2005b. Deficiency in the gap junction protein connexin32 alters p27Kip1 tumor suppression and MAPK activation in a tissue‐specific manner. Oncogene 24:1718‐1726.
   Larsen, W.J., Wert, S.E., and Brunner, G.D. 1986. A dramatic loss of cumulus cell gap junctions is correlated with germinal vesicle breakdown in rat oocytes. Dev. Biol. 113:517‐521.
   Rosenkranz, M., Rosenkranz, H.S., and Klopman, G. 1997. Intercellular communication, tumor promotion and non‐genotoxic carcinogenesis: Relationships based upon structural considerations. Mutat. Res. 381:171‐188.
   Rosenkranz, H.S., Pollack, N., and Cunningham, A.R. 2000. Exploring the relationship between the inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication and other biological phenomena. Carcinogenesis 21:1007‐1011.
   Sai, K., Kanno, J., Hasegawa, R., Trosko, J.E., and Inoue, T. 2000. Prevention of the down‐regulation of gap junctional intercellular communication by green tea in the liver of mice fed pentachlorophenol. Carcinogenesis 21:1671‐1676.
   Sohl, G. and Willecke, K. 2003. An update on connexin genes and their nomenclature in mouse and man. Cell Commun. Adhes. 10:173‐180.
   Sohl, G. and Willecke, K. 2004. Gap junctions and the connexin protein family. Cardiovasc. Res. 62:228‐232.
   Spray, D.C., Harris, A.L., and Bennett, M.V. 1981. Gap junctional conductance is a simple and sensitive function of intracellular pH. Science 211:712‐715.
   Spray, D.C., White, R.L., de‐Carvalho, A.C., Harris, A.L., and Bennett, M.V. 1984. Gating of gap junction channels. Biophys. J. 45:219‐230.
   Spray, D.C., Chanson, M., Moreno, A.P., Dermietzel, R., and Meda, P. 1991. Distinctive gap junction channel types connect WB cells, a clonal cell line derived from rat liver. Am. J. Physiol. 260:C513‐C527.
   Trosko, J.E. 2003. The role of stem cells and gap junctional intercellular communication in carcinogenesis. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 36:43‐48.
   Trosko, J.E. and Ruch, R.J. 2002. Gap junctions as targets for cancer chemoprevention and chemotherapy. Curr. Drug. Targets 3:465‐482.
   Trosko, J.E., Chang, C.C., Madhukar, B.V., and Dupont, E. 1993. Oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes and intercellular communication in the ‘Oncogeny as partially blocked ontogeny’ hypothesis. In New Frontiers in Cancer Causation (O.H. Iversen, ed.) pp. 181‐197. Taylor and Francis Publishers, Washington, D.C.
   Trosko, J.E., Chang, C.C., Wilson, M.R., Upham, B., Hayashi, T., and Wade, M. 2000. Gap junctions and the regulation of cellular functions of stem cells during development and differentiation. Methods 20:245‐264.
   Trosko, J.E., Chang, C.C., Upham, B.L., and Tai, M.H. 2004. Ignored hallmarks of carcinogenesis: stem cells and cell‐cell communication. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci 1028:192‐201.
   Trosko, J.E., Yotti, L.P., Warren, S.T., Tsushimoto, G., and Chang, C. 1982. Inhibition of cell‐cell communication by tumor promoters. Carcinog. Compr. Surv. 7:565‐585.
   Upham, B.L., Masten, S.J., Lockwood, B.R., and Trosko, J.E. 1994. Nongenotoxic effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their ozonation by‐products on the intercellular communication of rat liver epithelial cells. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 23:470‐475.
   Upham, B.L., Park, J.S., Babica, P., Sovadinova, I., Rummel, A.M., Trosko, J.E., Hirose, A., Hasegawa, A., Kanno, J., and Sai, K. 2009. Structure‐activity‐dependent regulation of cell communication by perfluorinated fatty acids using in vivo and in vitro model systems. Environ. Health Perspect. 117:545‐550.
   Wade, M.H., Trosko, J.E., and Schindler, M. 1986. A fluorescence photobleaching assay of gap junction‐mediated communication between human cells. Science 232:525‐528.
   Yamasaki, H. 1996. Role of disrupted gap junctional intercellular communication in detection and characterization of carcinogens. Mutat. Res. 365:91‐105.
   Yamasaki, H. and Naus, C.C.G. 1996. Role of connexin genes in growth control. Carcinogenesis 17:1199‐1213.
   Yamasaki, H., Krutovskikh, V., Mesnil, M., Columbano, A., Tsuda, H., and Ito, N. 1993. Gap junctional intercellular communication and cell proliferation during rat liver carcinogenesis. Environ. Health Perspect. 101:191‐197.
   Yamasaki, H., Krutovskikh, V., Mesnil, M., Tanaka, T., Zaidan, D.M., and Omori, Y. 1999. Role of connexin (gap junction) genes in cell growth control and carcinogenesis. C. R. Acad. Sci. III. 322:151‐159.
   Yang, S. and Li, W.H. 2009. Assaying dynamic cell‐cell junctional communication using noninvasive and quantitative fluorescence imaging techniques: LAMP and infrared‐LAMP. Nat. Protoc. 4:94‐101.
   Ye, Y.X., Bombick, D., Hirst, K., Zhang, G.X., Chang, C.C., Trosko, J.E., and Akera, T. 1990. The modulation of gap junctional communication by gossypol in various mammalian cell lines in vitro. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 14:817‐832.
   Yotti, L.P., Chang, C.C., and Trosko, J.E. 1979. Elimination of metabolic cooperation in Chinese hamster cells by a tumor promoter. Science 206:1089‐1091.
   Zeller, R. 1989. Fixation, embedding, and sectioning of tissues, embryos, and single cells. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 7:14.1.1‐14.1.8.
   Ziambaras, K., Lecanda, F., Steinberg, T.H., and Civitelli, R. 1998. Cyclic stretch enhances gap junctional communication between osteoblastic cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 13:218‐228.
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library