Share This Print
Current Protocols in Toxicology

Current Protocols in Toxicology

Last Update: November 08, 2017
Print ISSN: 1934-9254
Online ISSN: 1934-9262


Online Subscriptions are now available! Visit the How to Order page for more information.

What's New in Current Protocols in Toxicology
Supplement 74, November 2017

Unit 1.14 Metallic Nano-Composite Toxicity Evaluation by Zebrafish Embryo Toxicity Test with Identification of Specific Exposure Biomarkers
         Abstract | Full Text:  HTML   PDF

Unit 4.43 Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) for Identification of Designer Stimulants Including 2C Amines, NBOMe Compounds, and Cathinones in Urine
         Abstract | Full Text:  HTML   PDF

Unit 4.44 Measuring β-Galactosidase Activity in Gram-Positive Bacteria Using a Whole-Cell Assay with MUG as a Fluorescent Reporter
         Abstract | Full Text:  HTML   PDF

Unit 11.1 Overview of Neurotoxicology
         Abstract | Full Text:  HTML   PDF

Unit 11.24 Co-Culture of Neurons and Microglia
         Abstract | Full Text:  HTML   PDF

Unit 16.11 Inter- and Intra-Laboratory Standardization of TUNEL Assay for Assessment of Sperm DNA Fragmentation
         Abstract | Full Text:  HTML   PDF

Unit 18.20 Isolation, Cryopreservation, and Immunophenotyping of Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells
         Abstract | Full Text:  HTML   PDF

Current Protocols in Toxicology is the best updated methods resource for accurate, efficient assessment of toxicity in whole organisms, organs and tissues, cells, and biochemical pathways. Including contributions from scientists globally, this title provides step-by-step protocols for the molecular analysis of the pathways, processes, and phenomena associated with toxic insults.

A subscription gives you access to all the content in the collection plus four quarterly issues of new and updated content. Current Protocols in Toxicology

  • provides the latest models and methods from molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, and genetics as they are applied in a toxicology context
  • includes methods for analysis of the major pathways associated with responses to toxicants
  • describes whole-animal and in vitro model systems for testing and characterizing the responses to toxic agents
  • includes methods focused on modern techniques for drug transporters, regulatory toxicology, and developmental and environmental studies

Edited by: Lucio G. Costa (University of Washington); Julio C. Davila (University of Puerto Rico); David A. Lawrence (Wadsworth Center); Yvonne Will (Pfizer); Advisory Editor: Ernest Hodgson (North Carolina State University); Donald J. Reed (Oregon State University); Guest Editors: Alan R. Buckpitt (University of California, Davis); Gabriella Coruzzi (University of Parma Medical School); José Manautou (University of Connecticut); Past Editor-in-Chief: Mahin Maines (University of Rochester School of Medicine); Past Editors: James S. Bus (The Dow Chemical Company); Shigeru Sassa (Rockefeller University); I. Glenn Sipes (University of Arizona)

Developmental Editor: Eric Prager

While the authors, editors, and publisher believe that the specification and usage of reagents, equipment, and devices, as set forth in this book, are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication, they accept no legal responsibility for any errors or omissions, and make no warranty, express or implied, with respect to material contained herein. In view of ongoing research, equipment modifications, changes in governmental regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to the use of experimental reagents, equipment, and devices, the reader is urged to review and evaluate the information provided in the package insert or instructions for each chemical, piece of equipment, reagent, or device for, among other things, any changes in the instructions or indication of usage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important in regard to new or infrequently employed chemicals or experimental reagents. Moreover, the information presented herein is not a substitute for professional judgment, especially as concerns any applications in a clinical setting or the interpretation of results thereby obtained.