User Ratings

Your rating: None
Your rating: None
Your rating: None
Add your comments

In Vivo Marking of Single Cells in Chick Embryos Using Photoactivation of GFP

D. A. Stark1,  P. M. Kulesa1

1Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri

Unit Number: 
Unit 12.8
DOI: 
10.1002/0471143030.cb1208s28
Online Posting Date: 
October, 2005
GO TO THE FULL TEXT:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library
Are you the author of this protocol? Login or register and return to this page.

Abstract

Selective marking of a single cell within a living embryo is often difficult due to the inaccuracy and invasiveness of standard techniques. This unit describes a minimally invasive optical protocol that uses 405-nm laser light to photoactivate a variant of green fluorescent protein (PAGFP). This method takes advantage of the accessibility of the chick embryo to inject PAGFP into a region of interest and uses electroporation to deliver the construct into cells. This unit describes in detail how single and small groups of cells (n<10) that express PAGFP can be made visually distinguishable from the host population using the photoactivation process. Included is a means to maximize the fluorescence increase due to photoactivated GFP signal and to reduce photobleaching. Briefly outlined are previously developed chick culture and time-lapse imaging techniques to allow for the subsequent monitoring of photoactivated cell migratory behaviors. The technique has the potential to be a less-invasive, accurate tool for in vivo studies that involve following cell lineage and cell migration.

Keywords: photoactivation; GFP; chick; embryo; cell labeling; lineage

     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Table of Contents

  • Unit Introduction
  • Basic Protocol: Photoactivation of GFP in Single Cells in Chick Embryos
  • Alternate Protocol: In Ovo Photoactivation
  • Support Protocol: Imaging Using High-Magnification Acquisition
  • Commentary
  • Literature Cited
  • Figures
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Materials

Basic Protocol: Photoactivation of GFP in Single Cells in Chick Embryos

 Materials
  • Fertilized white Leghorn chick eggs incubated at 37°C
  • India ink (drawing ink, Pelikan)
  • Howard Ringer's solution (J.A. Webster), sterile
  • 10 mg/ml Fast Green FCF (Fisher) in Howard Ringer's solution, optional
  • PAGFP construct (available from J. Lippincott-Schwartz; jlippin@helix.nih.gov)
  • H2B-mRFP construct (optional; available from P. Kulesa; pmk@stowers-institute.org)
  • 70% ethanol
  • High-vacuum silicone grease (Dow Corning)
  • B27 supplement (Invitrogen)
  • Neural basal medium (Invitrogen)
  • l-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich)
  • H2O, sterile
  • Human fibronectin (Invitrogen), diluted to 20 µg/ml in phosphate butter
  • Egg incubator (G.Q.F. Manufacturing Co., Model 1550)
  • 15-ml tubes
  • Glass capillary tubes; borosilicate with filament (Sutter Instrument)
  • Glass needle puller (Sutter Instrument, Model P-87)
  • Micropipet loader
  • 20-µl pipettor
  • Picospritzer (Picospritzer III, Parker Hannifin Corporation)
  • Dumont no. 5 forceps and iris scissors (Fine Science Tools)
  • Electroporator (BTX)
  • Platinum electrodes (A.M. Systems)
  • 18- and 25-G needles (Becton Dickinson)
  • 1- and 5-ml syringes (VWR)
  • Tape (e.g., Scotch)
  • Plastic transfer pipet, sterile
  • Tungsten needle (A.M. Systems)
  • Micromanipulator (World Precision Instruments)
  • 6-well culture plates
  • Soldering tool (Weller)
  • Sandpaper, medium grade (3M)
  • Glass cover slips, 22-mm round (VWR)
  • Culture insert (Millipore)
  • Petri dishes (Falcon)
  • Fluorescence stereo microscope with halogen light source and appropriate filters (LP-DAPI, TRITC; Leica)
  • Whatman no.1 filter paper
  • Dissecting scissors
  • Stereo dissecting microscope
  • Confocal inverted laser scanning microscope with 488- and 405-nm laser lines (Zeiss LSM5 PASCAL) and cell tracking software (optional)
  • Parafilm
  • Cardboard (1/4-in. thick)
  • Velcro (sticky back tape)
  • Insulation for cardboard box (5/16-in. thick; Reflectix)
  • Clear plastic packaging tape
  • Chick incubator heater (Model 115-20, Lyon)

Alternate Protocol: In Ovo Photoactivation

 Additional Materials (also see Basic Protocol)
  • Beeswax (Eastman Kodak)
  • Microinjected and electroporated eggs (see Basic Protocol)
  • 3.8-cm × 7.5-cm × 15-µm Teflon membrane, high-sensitivity, oxygen permeable (Fisher)
  • ~2.2-cm i.d. × 2.6-cm o.d. × 0.5-cm high acrylic ring (constructed in machine shop)
  • 2.4-cm i.d. × 2.1-cm o.d. rubber O ring (constructed in machine shop)
  • Upright, laser scanning confocal microscope with 488-nm and 405-nm laser excitation, equipped with a long working distance 10× Plan Neofluar objective (NA = 0.3)

Support Protocol: Imaging Using High-Magnification Acquisition

 Additional Materials (also see Basic Protocol)
  • Embryos on culture inserts (see Basic Protocol)
  • Glass-bottomed petri dishes (Mat Tek)
  • Glass microscope slides (VWR)
  • Coverslips, 22-mm
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Figures

  • Figure 12.8.1
    A diagram of the photoactivation process in a chick embryo. A summary outline of the photoactivation technique starting with the injection of PAGFP and H2B-mRFP constructs and ending with the photoactivation in the whole chick embryo. From left to right this figure shows a flowchart of the photoactivation process in a chick embryo, including: (A) injection, (B) electroporation, (C) mounting, (D) region of interest targeting, (E) selection of an individual cell for photoactivation, and (F) the photoactivation process.

  • Figure 12.8.2
    Photoactivation of PAGFP in a single cell in a living chick embryo. (A) A global view of a 16-somite chick embryo (5× magnification) showing post-photoactivation of PAGFP in a single cell (green-colored cell, within the box region) surrounded by a subpopulation of host cells (red). (A¢) A magnified view of the box region in A shows the photoactivated cell (green-colored). (B) The photoactivation process in a single cell within the chick embryo is shown as a sequential series of confocal excitation scans. The top row represents the 405-nm excitation scans of the cell (blue) at various time points of a typical sequence. The second row shows the resulting increase in GFP-fluorescence after each 405-nm excitation scan is followed by a 488-nm excitation scan. (C,D) As an example of the ability to observe individual cells within the chick embryo, two individual migrating cells (labeled as 1 and 2) were photoactivated separately at a time when the cells were just starting to emerge and migrate into the surrounding unlabeled tissue. The subpopulation of cells (red) within the chick neural tube provide a background view of other adjacent migrating and non-migrating cells. After a 13-hr reincubation of the whole embryo explant in culture, the final image (D) shows the location of the original cells that have migrated further laterally away from the neural tube. The cells (1 and 2) appear to have divided. The scale bar is 50 µm. The embryo in (A) is ~2 mm in length. The individual cell in B has a diameter of ~15 µm. The labels refer to the midbrain (m) and rhombomeres 1 to 4 (r1, r2, r3, r4).

Literature Cited

Literature Cited
    Ando, H., Furuta, T., Tsien, R.Y., and Okamoto, H. 2001. Photo-mediated gene activation using caged RNA/DNA in zebrafish embryos. Nat. Genet. 28:317-325.
    Chalfie, M., Tu, Y., Euskirchen, G., Ward, W.W., and Prasher, D.C. 1994. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263:802-805.
    Chudakov, D.M., Verkhusha, V.V., Staroverov, D.B., Souslova, E.A., Lukyanov, S., and Lukyanov, K.A. 2004. Photoswitchable cyan fluorescent protein for protein tracking. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:1435-1440.
    Fraser, S.E. 1996 Iontophoretic dye labeling of embryonic cells. Methods Cell Biol. 51:147-160.
    Hamburger, V. and Hamilton, H.L. 1951. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Embryol. Exper. Morph. 88:49-92.
    Itasaki, N., Bel-Vialar, S., and Krumlauf, R. 1999. Shocking developments in chick embryology: Electroporation and in ovo gene expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:E203-E207.
    Patterson, G.H. and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. 2002. A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling of proteins and cells. Science 297:1873-1877.
    Patterson, G.H. and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. 2003. Development and use of fluorescent protein markers in living cells. Science 300:87-91.
    Sawin, K.E. and Nurse, P. 1997. Photoactivation of green fluorescent protein. Curr. Biol. 7:R606-R607.
    Stern, C.D. and Fraser, S.E. 2001. Tracing the lineage of tracing cell lineage. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:E216-E218.
    Yokoe, H. and Meyer, T. 1996. Spatial dynamics of GFP-tagged proteins investigated by local fluorescence enhancement. Nat. Biotechnol. 14:1252-1256.
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library
Looking for Answers?
Do you have tips, tricks, or improvements to share?

Join the Conversation

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.