User Ratings

Your rating: None
Your rating: None
Your rating: None
Add your comments

Activity‐Based Protein Profiling (ABPP) and Click Chemistry (CC)–ABPP by MudPIT Mass Spectrometry

Anna E. Speers1,  Benjamin F. Cravatt1

1The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology and Department of Physiological Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California

Unit Number: 
DOI: 
10.1002/9780470559277.ch090138
Online Posting Date: 
December, 2009
GO TO THE FULL TEXT:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Interscience
Are you the author of this protocol? Login or register and return to this page.

Abstract

Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) is a chemical proteomic method for functional interrogation of enzymes within complex proteomes. This unit presents a protocol for in vitro and in vivo labeling using ABPP and Click Chemistry (CC)-ABPP probes for in-depth profiling using the Multi-dimensional Protein Identification Technology (MudPIT) analysis platform. Curr. Protoc. Chem Biol. 1:29-41. © 2009 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Keywords: activity-based protein profiling; ABPP; click chemistry; mass spectrometry; MudPIT; activity-based probes; biotin; alkyne; azide

     
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Interscience

Table of Contents

  • Introduction
  • Basic Protocol 1: Labeling Enzymes In Vitro by ABPP
  • Alternate Protocol: Labeling Enzymes in Living Cells or Mice by Click Chemistry–Activity-Based Protein Profiling (CC-ABPP)
  • Support Protocol 1: Preparation of Cells/Tissue Homogenates
  • Support Protocol 2: Methanol/Chloroform Precipitation of Proteins
  • Basic Protocol 2: Enrichment and Digestion of Probe-Labeled Proteins for MudPIT Analysis
  • Reagents and Solutions
  • Commentary
  • Literature Cited
  • Figures
  • Topics
    • Chemical Biology
    • Intermolecular Interactions
    • Molecular Biology
    • Proteomics
     
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Interscience

Materials

Basic Protocol 1: Labeling Enzymes In Vitro by ABPP

 Materials
  • 1 mg protein/ml proteome source (e.g., cell or tissue homogenate; see Support Protocol 1)
  • 100× (0.5 to 2 mM) biotinylated ABPP probe stock in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (for details of synthesis, see Evans and Cravatt, 2006; Cravatt et al., 2008; and Paulick and Bogyo, 2008; store up to several years at –20° or –80°C)
  • Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
  • 10% (v/v) Triton X-100 (store up to several months at room temperature)
  • 50 mM Tris×Cl, pH 8.0 (store up to several months at 4°C)
  • 10% (w/v) SDS in water
  • End-over-end rotator
  • 10DG disposable chromatography columns (BioRad)
  • 15-ml conical centrifuge tubes
  • 90°C heating block

Alternate Protocol: Labeling Enzymes in Living Cells or Mice by Click Chemistry–Activity-Based Protein Profiling (CC-ABPP)

 Additional Materials (also see Basic Protocol 1)
  • Cells growing in culture in 15-cm plates or laboratory mice
  • 1000× (5 to 25 mM) probe-alkyne stock in DMSO (for details of synthesis, see Evans and Cravatt, 2006; Cravatt et al., 2008; and Paulick and Bogyo, 2008; store up to several years at –20°C), for cell culture experiment
  • 1× Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (D-PBS; Invitrogen; without calcium and magnesium)
  • 1 to 5 mg/ml probe-alkyne in vehicle (see recipe)
  • Vehicle
  • 5 mM biotin-azide (PEG4 carboxamide-6-azidohexanyl biotin; Invitrogen) in DMSO (store up to several years at –20°C)
  • 50 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP; Fluka) in H2O (prepare fresh prior to use)
  • 1.7 mM TBTA (see recipe)
  • 50 mM CuSO4×5H2O in H2O (store up to several months at room temperature; remake if precipitate forms)
  • Methanol, cold
  • 2.5% (w/v) SDS in Ca- and Mg-free D-PBS (store up to several months at room temperature)
  • Cell scraper
  • Refrigerated centrifuge
  • Animal balance
  • Probe sonicator
  • 60°C water bath or heating block
  • Additional reagents and equipment for preparing cell/tissue homogenates (Support Protocol 1) and methanol:chloroform precipitation (Support Protocol 2)

NOTE: All protocols using live animals must first be reviewed and approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) or must conform to governmental regulations regarding the care and use of laboratory animals.

Support Protocol 1: Preparation of Cells/Tissue Homogenates

 Additional Materials
  • Harvested cells/tissue
  • 1× Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (D-PBS; Invitrogen; without calcium and magnesium)
  • Protein assay kit: e.g., DC protein assay (BioRad)
  • Razor blade
  • Glass plate or large tissue culture dish
  • Dounce homogenizer
  • Probe sonicator
  • Refrigerated centrifuge
  • Ultracentrifuge
  • Insulin syringe

Support Protocol 2: Methanol/Chloroform Precipitation of Proteins

 Materials
  • Methanol
  • Chloroform
  • 15-ml conical centrifuge tubes
  • Refrigerated centrifuge

Basic Protocol 2: Enrichment and Digestion of Probe-Labeled Proteins for MudPIT Analysis

 Materials
  • SDS-solubilized protein sample (Basic Protocol 1 or the Alternate Protocol)
  • 1× Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (D-PBS; Invitrogen; without calcium and magnesium)
  • Streptavidin beads: 50% (v/v) slurry of Immunopure immobilized streptavidin (Pierce)
  • 1% (w/v) SDS in Ca- and Mg-free D-PBS (store up to several months at room temperature)
  • 6 M and 2 M urea in Ca- and Mg-free D-PBS (prepare fresh prior to use)
  • 200 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) in H2O (prepare fresh daily, or store aliquots at –20°C for months)
  • 500 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) in H2O (prepare fresh daily, or store aliquots at –20°C for months)
  • 100 mM CaCl2 in H2O (store at room temperature for months)
  • 0.5 mg/ml sequence-grade modified trypsin (Promega) supplied in resuspension buffer
  • 90% formic acid
  • 50% (v/v) acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in H2O (prepare fresh prior to use)
  • 5% (v/v) formic acid (FA) in H2O
  • Empty Micro Bio-Spin Chromatography Columns (BioRad, cat. no. 732-6204)
  • End-over-end rotator
  • Low-adhesion screw-top microcentrifuge tubes (Sarstedt)
  • Gel-loading pipet tips
  • 65°C water bath or heat block
  • SpeedVac evaporator
     
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Interscience

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    The ABPP-MudPIT method for high-content proteomic analysis of enzyme activities. A proteome is labeled with a biotinylated ABPP probe, and labeled proteins are affinity enriched on streptavidin beads. After on-bead trypsin digest, the tryptic peptides are analyzed by MudPIT for identification and quantification (e.g., via spectra counting). Box: The probe-labeled peptides can also be eluted from the streptavidin beads for MS analysis of labeling sites.

Literature Cited

Literature Cited
    Alexander, J.P., and Cravatt, B.F. 2006. The putative endocannabinoid transport blocker LY2183240 is a potent inhibitor of FAAH and several other brain serine hydrolases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128:9699-9704.
    Bachovchin, D.A., Brown, S.J., Rosen, H., and Cravatt, B.F. 2009. Identification of selective inhibitors of uncharacterized enzymes by high-throughput screening with fluorescent activity-based probes. Nat. Biotechnol. 27:387-394.
    Cravatt, B.F., Wright, A.T., and Kozarich, J.W. 2008. Activity-based protein profiling: From enzyme chemistry to proteomic chemistry. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77:383-414.
    Evans, M.J. and Cravatt, B.F. 2006. Mechanism-based profiling of enzyme families. Chem. Rev. 106:3279-3301.
    Greenbaum, D.C., Baruch, A., Grainger, M., Bozdech, Z., Medzihradszky, K.F., Engel, J., DeRisi, J., Holder, A.A., and Bogyo, M. 2002. A role for the protease falcipain 1 in host cell invasion by the human malaria parasite. Science 298:2002-2006.
    Gygi, S.P., Rist, B., Gerber, S.A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M.H., and Aebersold, R. 1999. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:994-999.
    Hansen, K.C., Schmitt-Ulms, G., Chalkley, R.J., Hirsch, J., Baldwin, M.A., and Burlingame, A.L. 2003. Mass spectrometric analysis of protein mixtures at low levels using cleavable 13C-isotope-coded affinity tag and multidimensional chromatography. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2:299-314.
    Ito, T., Ota, K., Kubota, H., Yamaguchi, Y., Chiba, T., Sakuraba, K., and Yoshida, M. 2002. Roles for the two-hybrid system in exploration of the yeast protein interactome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1:561-566.
    Jessani, N. and Cravatt, B.F. 2004. The development and application of methods for activity-based protein profiling. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8:54-59.
    Jessani, N., Liu, Y., Humphrey, M., and Cravatt, B.F. 2002. Enzyme activity profiles of the secreted and membrane proteome that depict cancer cell invasiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:10335-10340.
    Jessani, N., Niessen, S., Wei, B.Q., Nicolau, M., Humphrey, M., Ji, Y., Han, W., Noh, D.Y., Yates, J.R. 3rd, Jeffrey, S.S., and Cravatt, B.F. 2005. A streamlined platform for high-content functional proteomics of primary human specimens. Nat. Methods 2:691-697.
    Kidd, D., Liu, Y., and Cravatt, B.F. 2001. Profiling serine hydrolase activities in complex proteomes. Biochemistry 40:4005-4015.
    Kobe, B. and Kemp, B.E. 1999. Active site-directed protein regulation. Nature 402:373-376.
    Kolb, H.C. and Sharpless, K.B. 2003. The growing impact of click chemistry on drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 8:1128-1137.
    Link, A.J., Jennings, J.L., and Washburn, M.P. 2003. Analysis of protein composition using multidimensional chromatography and mass spectrometry. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 34:23.1.1-23.1.25.
    Liu, Y., Patricelli, M.P., and Cravatt, B.F. 1999. Activity-based protein profiling: The serine hydrolases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:14694-14699.
    MacBeath, G. 2002. Protein microarrays and proteomics. Nat. Genet. 32:526-532.
    Okerberg, E.S., Wu, J., Zhang, B., Samii, B., Blackford, K., Winn, D.T., Shreder, K.R., Burbaum, J.J., and Patricelli, M.P. 2005. High-resolution functional proteomics by active-site peptide profiling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102:4996-5001.
    Patricelli, M.P., Giang, D.K., Stamp, L.M., and Burbaum, J.J. 2001. Direct visualization of serine hydrolase activities in complex proteomes using fluorescent active site-directed probes. Proteomics 1:1067-1071.
    Patricelli, M.P., Szardenings, A.K., Liyanage, M., Nomanbhoy, T.K., Wu, M., Weissig, H., Aban, A., Chun, D., Tanner, S., and Kozarich, J.W. 2007. Functional interrogation of the kinome using nucleotide acyl phosphates. Biochemistry 46:350-358.
    Patton, W.F., Schulenberg, B., and Steinberg, T.H. 2002. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis; better than a poke in the ICAT Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13:321-328.
    Paulick, M.G. and Bogyo, M. 2008. Application of activity-based probes to the study of enzymes involved in cancer progression. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 18:97-106.
    Salisbury, C.M. and Cravatt, B.F. 2007. Activity-based probes for proteomic profiling of histone deacetylase complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104:1171-1176.
    Sieber, S.A., Niessen, S., Hoover, H.S., and Cravatt, B.F. 2006. Proteomic profiling of metalloprotease activities with cocktails of active-site probes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2:274-281.
    Speers, A.E. and Cravatt, B.F. 2004. Profiling enzyme activities in vivo using click chemistry methods. Chem. Biol. 11:535-546.
    Washburn, M.P., Wolters, D., and Yates, J.R. 3rd. 2001. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:242-247.
    Weerapana, E., Speers, A.E., and Cravatt, B.F. 2007. Tandem orthogonal proteolysis-activity-based protein profiling (TOP-ABPP)—a general method for mapping sites of probe modification in proteomes. Nat. Protoc. 2:1414-1425.
     
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Interscience
Looking for Answers?
Do you have tips, tricks, or improvements to share?

Join the Conversation

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.