Rule Out (R/O) Arteriovenous Malformation
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Abstract
When imaging patients for intracranial arteriovenous malformations, the goals are: (1) to determine if an arteriovenous malformation is present; (2) to assess size, shape, and location of the nidus; (3) to determine potential arterial feeders and venous drainage routes (including screening for aneurysms on arterial feeders); and (4) to determine the state of the surrounding brain parenchyma, including the identification of intracranial hemorrhage. A post-contrast 3-D spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) sequence is used for sequences 1 to 3. Standard MR imaging sequences are used to evaluate the brain parenchyma. The protocol contained within this unit can be used for the evaluation of stable patients. In order to perform the optional sequences with perfusion and diffusion studies, a scanner with echoplanar capabilities is required; however, the standard anatomical MR imaging sequences included in the protocols do not require these faster gradients.
Materials
- Gadolinium-based MR contrast agent (e.g., Magnevist, Omniscan, Prohance)
- Normal saline (0.9% NaCl), sterile
Figures
-
Figure A1.5.1Post-contrast (A) transverse and (B) coronal 3-D gradient echo sequence demonstrating an arteriovenous malformaton (AVM) located in the right frontal lobe. The AVM is supplied by the right anterior and middle cerebral arteries, and is drained by enlarged cortical veins that drain into the superior saggital sinus.
-
Figure A1.5.2MIP images from the 3-D spoiled gradient echo data in (A) transverse and (B) coronal orientations. The feeding arteries from the anterior and middle cerebral arteries are demonstrated, as well as the enlarged cortical veins draining the AVM into the superior saggital sinus.
Literature Cited
| Literature Cited | |
| Kondziolka, D., Lunsford, L.D., Kanal, E., and Talagala, L. 1994. Stereotactic magnetic resonance angiography for targeting in arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 35:585-590; discussion 590-591. | |
| Nussel, F., Wegmuller, H., and Huber, P. 1991. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional angiography in cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Neuroradiology 33:56-61. | |
| Schlemmer, H.P., Hess, T., Debus, J., Knopp, M.V., Schad, L.R., and Engenhart, R. 1994. TOF-MR angiography in radiotherapy treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Radiologe 34:447-453. | |
| Shellock, F.G. 1996. Pocket Guide to MR Procedures and Metallic Objects. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia. | |
| Yano, T., Kodama, T., Suzuki, Y., and Watanabe, K. 1997. Gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. Experimental and clinical evaluation. Acta Radiol. 38:47-54. | |
Troubleshooting Tips
|
TOOLS & CALCULATORS |





Join the Conversation
Post new comment