User Ratings

Your rating: None
Your rating: None
Your rating: None
Add your comments

Cross‐Species Genetic Toxicity Assessment Accomplished by Flow Cytometric Analysis of Blood

Jeffrey C. Bemis1,  Dorothea K. Torous1,  Carol R. Tometsko1,  Stephen D. Dertinger1

1Litron Laboratories, Rochester, New York

Unit Number: 
Unit 2.14
DOI: 
10.1002/0471140856.tx0214s36
Online Posting Date: 
May, 2008
GO TO THE FULL TEXT:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library
Are you the author of this protocol? Login or register and return to this page.

Abstract

The formation of micronuclei in blood cells has been an established indicator of genotoxicity for decades. Standard microscopy methods are time-consuming and lack the objectivity that fully automated methods can provide. The ability of flow cytometric technology to rapidly and objectively survey thousands of cells for micronuclei can significantly improve the value of this endpoint. In addition, since many more cells can be scored, and specific populations can be targeted, species that historically have been difficult to obtain micronucleus data from, such as humans, can now be readily evaluated using this methodology. This unit describes a procedure for fixation, staining, and analysis of blood samples using materials supplied in MicroFlow kits (Litron Laboratories) and a single-laser flow cytometer. This methodology provides a reliable, robust assessment of chromosome damage that is used in basic science research as well as drug-safety screening programs at large pharmaceutical and chemical companies. Curr. Protoc. Toxicol. 36:2.14.1-2.14.15. © 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Keywords: genotoxicity; chromosome damage; micronuclei; reticulocytes; erythrocytes; CD71-defined antigen; CD61-defined antigen; cross species

     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Table of Contents

  • Introduction
  • Basic Protocol: Genetic Toxicity Assessment in Mouse Blood
  • Alternate Protocol: Genetic Toxicity Assessment Using High-Density Rat Blood Samples
  • Reagents and Solutions
  • Commentary
  • Literature Cited
  • Figures
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Materials

Basic Protocol: Genetic Toxicity Assessment in Mouse Blood

 Materials
  • MicroFlowPLUS kit (Litron Laboratories) specific for the species in use and containing:
    • Fixative (solution A)
    • Anticoagulant (solution B)
    • Washing/diluent buffer (solution C), ice cold
    • RNase solution (solution D)
    • Anti-CD71-FITC (solution E)
    • Propidium iodide (solution F)
    • Anti-CD61-PE (solution G)
    • Malaria biostandard
  • Peripheral blood sample (e.g., mouse, rat, canine, nonhuman primate, human) treated according to experimental design
  • Labeling solution I (see recipe)
  • Labeling solution II (see recipe)
  • DNA staining solution (see recipe)
  • 2.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes
  • 15-ml screw-cap polypropylene tubes
  • –85°C chest freezer
  • Refrigerated centrifuge
  • 12 × 75–mm polypropylene or polystyrene flow cytometry tubes
  • Aluminum foil
  • Flow cytometer equipped with 488-nm excitation and appropriate filters (e.g., 530- ±30-nm band-pass filter and 650-nm long-pass filter for green and red fluorescence, respectively)
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

Figures

  • Figure 2.14.1
    Set the Single cells region in Plot A of the template (A) and using Plot E, place the large population of the CD71-negative mouse blood sample just below the boundary of the RETs region (B) and low in the FL3 fluorescence channel.

  • Figure 2.14.2
    A kit-supplied Malaria biostandard sample stained in solution I is used to maximize the fluorescent resolution of RETs from NCEs, as well as erythrocytes with and without a micronucleus-like DNA content (A). The Malaria biostandard is also used to set appropriate compensation. Appropriate FL3-%FL2 compensation is evident when parasitized cells exhibit a vertical profile (B). This will be observed in Plot E of the template.

  • Figure 2.14.3
    The Malaria biostandard stained in solution I is used to set appropriate compensation of FITC (FL1) out of the yellow (FL2) channel (A). Appropriate FL3-%FL2 compensation is evident when RETs are directly above NCEs (B). This will be observed in Plot E of the template.

  • Figure 2.14.4
    The Malaria biostandard stained in solution I is used to set appropriate compensation of propidium iodide (FL3) out of the yellow (FL2) channel (A). Appropriate FL2-%FL3 compensation is evident when parasitized cells are no longer evident in the platelets region (B). This will be observed in Plot D of the template.

  • Figure 2.14.5
    Following appropriate adjustment of PMT voltages and compensation, the Malaria biostandard stained in solution II should exhibit a platelet staining pattern similar to this plot. This will be observed in Plot D of the template.

  • Figure 2.14.6
    For the Alternate Protocol, Plot E of the template employs a slightly different region to delineate the RETs that are highest in CD71 fluorescence intensity (FL1).

  • Figure 2.14.7
    Representative blood samples from control (A) and genotoxicant-treated (B) mice. Lower left quadrant = NCE; lower right quadrant = micronucleated NCE; upper left quadrant = RET; upper right quadrant = micronucleated RET. This will be observed in Plot F of the template.

Literature Cited

Literature Cited
    Abramsson-Zetterberg, L., Grawe, J., and Zetterberg, G. 1999. The micronucleus test in rat erythrocytes from bone marrow, spleen and peripheral blood: The response to low doses of ionizing radiation, cyclophosphamide and vincristine determined by flow cytometry. Mutat. Res. 423: 113-124.
    Dertinger, S.D., Torous, D.K., Hall, N., Tometsko, C.R., and Gasiewicz, T.A. 2000. Malaria-infected erythrocytes serve as biological standards to ensure reliable and consistent scoring of micronucleated erythrocytes by flow cytometry. Mutat. Res. 464: 195-200.
    Dertinger, S.D., Torous, D.K., Hall, N., and Tometsko, C.R. 2003. Measurement of cytogenetic damage in rodent blood with a single-laser flow cytometer. Curr. Protoc. Cytometry 23: 7.21.1-7.21.9.
    Dertinger, S.D., Camphausen, K., Macgregor, J.T., Bishop, M.E., Torous, D.K., Avlasevich, S., Cairns, S., Tometsko, C.R., Menard, C., Muanza, T., Chen, Y., Miller, R.K., Cederbrant, K., Sandelin, K., Ponten, I., and Bolcsfoldi, G. 2004. Three-color labeling method for flow cytometric measurement of cytogenetic damage in rodent and human blood. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 44: 427-435.
    Hayashi, M., Kodama, Y., Awogi, T., Suzuki, T., Asita, A.O., and Sofuni, T. 1992. The micronucleus assay using peripheral blood reticulocytes from mitomycin C- and cyclophosphamide-treated rats. Mutat. Res. 278: 209-213.
    Hayashi, M., MacGregor, J.T., Gatehouse, D.G., Adler, I.-D., Blakey, D.H., Dertinger, S.D., Krishna, G., Morita, T., Russo, A., and Sutou, S. 2000. In vivo rodent erythrocyte micronucleus assay: Aspects of protocol design including repeated treatments, integration with toxicity testing, and automated scoring. A report from the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures (IWGTP). Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 35: 234-252.
    Hayashi, M., MacGregor, J.T., Gatehouse, D.G., Blakey, D.H., Dertinger, S.D., Abramsson-Zetterberg, L., Krishna, G., Morita, T., Russo, A., Asano, N., Suzuki, H., Ohyama, W., and Gibson, D. In Vivo Micronucleus Assay Working Group, IWGT. 2007. In vivo erythrocyte micronucleus assay III. Validation and regulatory acceptance of automated scoring and the use of rat peripheral blood reticulocytes, with discussion of non-hematopoietic target cells and a single dose-level limit test. Mutat. Res. 627: 10-30.
    Honda, K.I., Ishiko, O., Hato, F., Kitagawa, S., Jikihara, I., Yoshida, H., and Ogita, S. 2001. CD71 antibody enhances iron uptake by mouse bone marrow cells and the survival potential of erythroid progenitor cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 8: 135-140.
    Iarmarcovai, G., Botta, A., and Orsiere, T. 2006. Number of centromeric signals in micronuclei and mechanisms of aneuploidy. Toxicol. Lett. 166: 1-10.
    Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1997. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals: Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test, Section 4, Guideline 474 (Draft: February 1997).
    Tometsko, A.M., Torous, D.K., and Dertinger, S.D. 1993. Analysis of micronucleated cells by flow cytometry. 1. Achieving high resolution with a malaria model. Mutat. Res. 292: 129-135.
    Torous, D.K., Hall, N.E., Dertinger, S.D., Diehl, M.S., Illi-Love, A.H., Cederbrant, K., Sandelin, K., Bolcsfoldi, G., Ferguson, L.R., Pearson, A., Majeska, J.B., Tarca, J.P., Hewish, D.R., Doughty, L., Fenech, M., Weaver, J.L., Broud, D.D., Gatehouse, D.G., Hynes, G.M., Kwanyuen, P., McLean, J., McNamee, J.P., Parenteau, M., Van Hoof, V., Vanparys, P., Lenarczyk, M., Siennicka, J., Litwinska, B., Slowikowska, M.G., Harbach, P.R., Johnson, C.W., Zhao, S., Aaron, C.S., Lynch, A.M., Marshall, I.C., Rodgers, B., and Tometsko, C.R. 2001. Flow cytometric enumeration of micronucleated reticulocytes: High transferability among 14 laboratories. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 38: 59-68.
    Tweats, D.J., Blakey, D., Heflich, R.H., Jacobs, A., Jacobsen, S.D., Morita, T., Nohmi, T., O'Donovan, M.R., Sasaki, Y.F., Sofuni, T., and Tice, R.; IWGT Working Group. 2007. Report of the IWGT working group on strategies and interpretation of regulatory in vivo tests I. Increases in micronucleated bone marrow cells in rodents that do not indicate genotoxic hazards. Mutat. Res. 627: 78-91.
    Udroiu, I. 2006. Feasibility of conducting the micronucleus test in circulating erythrocytes from different mammalian species: An anatomical perspective. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 47: 643-646.
    Wakata, A., Miyamae, Y., Sato, S., Suzuki, T., Morita, T., Asano, N., Awogi, T., Kondo, K., and Hayashi, M. 1998. Evaluation of the rat micronucleus test with bone marrow and peripheral blood: Summary of the 9th collaborative study by CSGMT/JEMS-MMS. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 32: 84-100.
     
 
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library
Looking for Answers?
Do you have tips, tricks, or improvements to share?

Join the Conversation

vbc

We are glad you like the site. Let us know if there is anything else you'd like to see!

shanthi (not verified)

i have great pleasure to visit yous web site

shanthi (not verified)

Thank you.

shanthi (not verified)

Thanking you for providing these type of web site.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.